Medium Term Copilot Readiness
How do we move from reactive to proactive Copilot readiness and governance?
The medium term is where Copilot readiness becomes a more mature governance programme, and where the real work on SharePoint governance for Copilot begins.
Rather than reactively blocking sites on an individual basis, you can start tackling all the sites across your business’s tenant proactively and putting in place more mature controls and processes that will help you improve your data governance for the long-term, with many benefits beyond just Copilot readiness.
While this isn’t a quick exercise, you can start by focusing on where the risks are.
How do we know where the risky SharePoint sites are and where we should focus first for Copilot?
Modern Microsoft tooling makes it unnecessary (and unrealistic) to manually review every SharePoint site.
In most tenants there can be thousands of sites, created through Teams, Outlook groups, shared channels, and private channels.
The sensible approach is to use reporting tools to identify the highest-risk sites:
- Inactive sites with no recent activity.
- Orphaned sites with no current owners.
- Sites with complex or excessive permissions.
- Sites with extensive external sharing.
These are the areas that pose the most risk to Copilot and to your organisation’s data security more broadly.
How can we remediate the higher risk sites?
Auditing alone doesn’t improve governance, which is where remediation comes in.
Examples of remediation-driven governance through capabilities within tools such as SharePoint Advanced Management include:
- Automatically prompting site owners to confirm inactive sites are still needed.
- Making sites read-only if there’s no response within a set period.
- Archiving sites that remain unused.
- Flagging and reducing excessive custom permissions.
These steps limit risk while still preserving access to content if it’s genuinely needed later.
Ownership is the single most important control for Microsoft 365 Copilot
Across all Copilot readiness work, one principle matters more than any other and that’s clear ownership.
When data has an owner, someone can:
- Confirm whether it’s still needed.
- Verify its sensitivity and appropriate access level.
- Act when reports flag a problem.
Orphaned content is an unmanaged risk and modern SharePoint governance for Copilot depends on structuring sites around accountable business owners, rather than central IT teams trying to own everything centrally.
How can sensitivity labels and DLP help improve Copilot readiness?
Sensitivity labels and data loss prevention (DLP) policies should also play an important supporting role in your Copilot readiness:
- Labels help you understand where sensitive data lives across your tenant.
- Copilot respects sensitivity labels and permissions automatically.
- Content generated by Copilot inherits sensitivity labels from its source material.
- DLP provides a backstop if content is mislabelled or stored in the wrong location.
These controls together reduce the likelihood of a damaging mistake, but don’t replace the need for good governance.